Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Winner of the Day: Santander
The RBS-led consortium has now officially won ABN Amro, and the WSJ has an excellent play-by-play of how the deal went down, including a graph of how the consortium members' stocks have been doing this year. While RBS is down 15% and Fortis is down 18%, Santander has been holding reasonably steady, down just 2.3% year-to-date.
There's good reason for this: the winner's curse falls mainly on RBS, with most of the rest of the brunt being borne by Fortis. Lina Saigol pointed out on Monday that the consortium is paying a premium of roughly 70% to where ABN shares would be trading had the takeover battle not happened. But why would the ABN shares be so low? Mainly because of credit-market woes – and it's RBS which is going to end up with ABN's credit-market operations.
Fortis is the other big potential loser in this deal, since ABN is based in Holland, and extracting ABN's capital-markets and headquarters operations from its Dutch retail operations is going to require some tricky surgery indeed.
Santander, on the other hand, is sitting pretty. It's getting the Italian operations – which have only recently been bought by ABN, and therefore should be quite easy to unbuy – as well as Banco Real in Brazil, which has always been run very much at arm's length. (When I reported a story for Euromoney about ABN's strategic interest in Brazil, it took me well over a year to find anybody associated with the Brazilian operations who wasn't based in Brazil and who could speak to the Dutch bank's global vision.)
Meanwhile, the economic outlook for Brazil is looking as positive as ever, even as recession fears continue to stalk the US.
RBS's Fred Goodwin, then, faces a long and arduous process of breaking up a $100 billion bank, and won't even get his coveted LaSalle at the end of it. Santander's Emilio Botín, on the other hand, should be able to start integrating Banco Real with his existing Brazilian operations much more quickly. And he has now truly consolidated, once and for all, Santander's position as the biggest and best bank in Latin America: Citigroup, his only real competitor in the region, has almost no presence in Brazil, which is by far Latin America's most important country.






