Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Zhang's High
My friends don't tend to collect art, but it seems that their friends do. Yesterday afternoon, I found out that a friend of a friend had sold his Zhang Xiaogang at Sotheby's for $400,000; and then yesterday evening I found out that a friend of an entirely different friend had sold his Zhang Xiaogang at Sotheby's, too, for $1 million. Both sales fell well short of the $3.1 million that "Chapter of a New Century -- Birth of the People's Republic of China" managed to fetch, but I can tell you that the $400,000 painting is just 15 3/4 by 11 3/4 inches, or about the size of two pieces of standard letter paper. I can also tell you that it was bought for $7,000 about 10 years ago, which gives it an annualized rate of return of 50%, more or less.
As for the $1 million painting, it was bought for about $15,000, and then, a few years ago, its owner moved cities. Not wanting the hassle of transporting the canvas, he tried to sell it back to the gallery for the same price he paid for it – and the gallery refused.
I can say with some confidence, then, that these paintings were not bought with speculative intent. But a lot of Chinese collectors now want to repatriate their country's patrimony, especially with regard to important artists of the 1990s such as Zhang. And they way they can do that is by bidding up his values to a level at which the paintings can get shaken loose from the grasp of collectors who happened to be in the right place at the right time and got lucky.
It might make sense to consider the market in Zhang to be a bubble: certainly his price appreciation would seem to be unsustainable. On the other hand, he's certainly an important Chinese artist, and with art it can be very difficult to know exactly who and where owners of important works are. Often the only way to get them to reveal themselves is to bid up the market for those works until the prices are so silly that the original buyers consign their pieces for sale.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





