Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

How Giving to Charity Will Help You Get Rich Quick
On Monday, I met Jim Whitton, a director of The Hunger Project, in a midtown cafe. The Hunger Project (THP) is a well-run non-profit which works efficiently and tirelessly towards sustainable poverty reduction in the developing world. With Whitton was Roger Hamilton, the chairman of something called the XL Group, which has just announced that it will give $5 million over five years to THP's programmes in India. The formal commitment is being made today, at the Clinton Global Initiative.
The deal is a winning one for all concerned. The Clinton Global Initiative has done what it was set up to do, which is catalyze commitments to improving the planet. The Hunger Project receives a large donation. And Roger Hamilton gets to be mentioned in the same breath as Bill Clinton, helping to give his XL Group kudos and respectability.
Hamilton loves to talk about creating his network of "social entrepeneurs," who give at least 10% of their profits to charity, and who will be a powerful force in terms of global poverty alleviation. In fact, Hamilton just loves to talk. He talks with great conviction and at great length, and he has turned his ability to talk into what I'm sure is a very lucrative business. For $3,300 you can hear him talk at his Entrepreneur Business School ("a journey of self and entrepreneurial discovery"), while for a mere $105 you can buy his 6-CD set called Wealth Dynamics ("a revolutionary technology that will guide you on your path to wealth"). Meanwhile, his magazine is a peculiar mix of inspirational stories with advertisements for "franchising opportunities" and the like.
Of course, there's no shortage of get-rich-quick merchants, and I find it interesting that Hamilton has hit upon giving money to charity as the way in which he distinguishes himself from the rest of the pack. Every time you sign up for one of his products, you feel good about it, because you know that he's giving some of the proceeds to charity and in fact that you and your fellow XL entrepeneurs are all pulling together in the service of a greater cause – while making lots of money, of course. The strategy seems to be working, too, at least for XL Group if not for its members.
This, then, is one reason why I still feel a little uncomfortable about the idea of for-profit philanthropy. In theory, and when it's practiced by the likes of Pierre Omidyar or Google.org or Richard Branson, it's a great idea and can work very well. But it can also create major conflicts of interest, as we saw with Banco Compartamos. And I fear that if the idea really starts to catch on then it risks being hijacked by the likes of Roger Hamilton, and people will view it with even more suspicion than they do already.






