Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Intellectual Property Among Magicians
In my Q&A with Susan Scafidi, I asked about Jim Surowiecki's assertion that the world of magic tricks manages to be innovative despite a lack of copyright protection. Susan replied that there might be no copyright protection, but that didn't mean that magic tricks didn't have their own, idiosyncratic, protection mechanisms:
Since my father is a serious amateur magician (and I confess to having performed a bit myself years ago), magic tricks are my favorite inapposite example. Not only is the literature copyrighted, but many effects are deliberately kept secret by magicians, and unlike fashion can't be torn apart at the seams by interlopers. Penn & Teller's antics aside, there's a guild – and it takes some effort to reach the inner circle.
Now, Alea has found a wonderful paper by Jacob Loshin which explains in fascinating detail how magic tricks are protected in practice. Here's a taster:
“Popular magic” remains easy to find. Anyone can go to the library to learn it or walk into the local magic shop to purchase it. This gives the false impression that the magic community does a poor job of controlling access to its secrets. In fact, however, the easy availability of “popular magic” brilliantly achieves what magicians call “misdirection.” “Popular magic” serves to satisfy those in search of the cheap secret. And “popular magic” gives them just that—cheap secrets. These secrets are harmless in the hands of the general public, since they tend not to compromise the more valuable secrets that magicians aim to preserve.
And here's an excellent example of the magicians' enforcement mechanism, from a magician named Walter Zaney Blaney:
[A] company in England, Illusions Plus, was selling still another rip-off of my illusion. When I protested to the owner, James Antony, he told me there was no court in the world which could stop him from what he was doing. I explained I had no intention of going to court. I instead simply told my many friends in [London’s] Magic Circle about it...
When the word spread, soon Mr. Antony ‘had a problem.’ As things turned out, there was indeed a court which promptly put him out of business... the bankruptcy court.
Go read the whole thing: I promise no magic-trick secrets are revealed!






