Nasdaq is not a Strategic Asset
Matt Cooper today describes a 19.9% stake in the Nasdaq stock exchange as a "strategic US asset" – going even further than Chuck Schumer, the only lawmaker who seems to have any concerns about the deal at all, who said only that the deal "gives me pause". Still, the idea that a minority stake in the Nasdaq is in any sense a strategic national asset of the US certainly proves what the WSJ said this morning, that protectionism in the US is increasing:
The U.S. doesn't allow foreign companies to buy airlines, shipping firms, television networks and some security-related businesses. The U.S. has raised concern about the increasing acquisitiveness of state-owned firms from China, Singapore and Middle Eastern countries. Yesterday, the Bush administration said it would scrutinize Nasdaq's proposed deal, a transaction that would give the Dubai government a stake in the U.S. stock-market operator.
A quick look at the dollar is all it takes to show that now is emphatically not a good time to start putting up barriers to foreign capital. Richard Branson isn't allowed to start an airline here unless he owns less than half of it and doesn't control it? Dubai Ports World isn't allowed to buy US ports? CNOOC isn't allowed to buy Unocal, a company most of whose assets aren't even in the US? Rupert Murdoch can't buy Fox without becoming a US citizen? All of these artificial barriers are harmful to the US economy: they reduce competitiveness, they make it harder for businesses to realize their true value, and they contribute to the weakening of the dollar because foreigners find it that much more difficult to buy US assets.
In all of those cases, however, at least the case could be made that a foreign company was buying a domestic company. In the case of the Dubai-Nasdaq deal, we're talking about a stake of less than 20%. How anybody who believes in a market economy could object to this deal, I have no idea. And Schumer's comments just serve to make him look like someone pandering to anti-Arab prejudice. Last time I looked, Wall Street was in New York State: he really ought to know better.
- The End of Excess
- Dec 5 2008 10:05AM EST
- The Great Recession Bites
- Dec 5 2008 9:35AM EST
- Extra Credit, Thursday Edition
- Dec 4 2008 7:08PM EST
- External Links on the NYT Home Page
- Dec 4 2008 4:40PM EST
- Jim Simons's Incentives
- Dec 4 2008 3:45PM EST
- How Does Posting Collateral Work?
- Dec 4 2008 2:02PM EST
- A Weird Argument for Index Funds
- Dec 4 2008 12:59PM EST
- Pricing Parking in Chicago
- Dec 4 2008 11:49AM EST
- A Smaller World
- Dec 4 2008 10:24AM EST
- How Can GM Bondholders be Bailed In?
- Dec 4 2008 9:45AM EST
- Viacom Datapoint of the Day
- Dec 4 2008 9:20AM EST
- Extra Credit, Wednesday Edition
- Dec 4 2008 2:55AM EST
- Spitzer vs Big Finance, Part 2
- Dec 4 2008 2:52AM EST
- The Problem With InTrade
- Dec 3 2008 5:52PM EST
- GM's Bond Restructuring Plan
- Dec 3 2008 4:44PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










