Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

How Deteriorating Crediworthiness Can Make You Millions (If You're a Bank)
It's not quite as laughable as it might seem at first glance that the latest tranche of investment-bank earnings reports showed hundreds of millions of dollars in profits from the fact that those banks' bonds had fallen in value. Morgan Stanley alone booked $390 million, or about 26% of its third-quarter profit, from the fact that its bonds are now worth substantially less than they were when they were issued.
That kind of profit might not, as Moody's says, constitute "high-quality, core earnings". But it's not entirely an accounting fiction, either. After all, a bank can make money on the asset side of its balance sheet if it buys assets at a low price and then they rise in value: it's called mark-to-market accounting. So the same bank sells bonds at a high price and then they fall in value, there's a mark-to-market profit there, as well.
Any investment bank worth its salt is at all times actively managing its liabilities. That means it's on the lookout for the kind of opportunities available to the quick and the market-focused: it might see an attractive swap rate between dollars and Chilean pesos, for instance, quickly issue a bond in a Chile, and swap its liability into sub-Libor funding in dollars. Banks' CFOs can also buy back their own debt in the secondary market, especially if they think it's trading at a substantial discount to fair value. In that case, the profit on the bonds' fall in price isn't just mark-to-market, it's real. If I sell you a bond for $1 and then buy it back for 90 cents, I've just made 10 cents in cash.
Which is not to say that these are the kind of earnings that banks like to crow about. But in times like these, they're not about to look a gift horse in the mouth, either.






