John Cassidy vs Brad DeLong
Brad DeLong is clearly much more important than I am. When I say rude things about John Cassidy, nothing much happens. But when Brad says rude things about John Cassidy, he gets a stinging riposte from Cassidy in his comments section, where Cassidy calls DeLong's posting "misleading and intemperate," and finishes with quite a flourish:
Brad, you are forever berating economic journalists. Some of that is healthy: we all make mistakes. But somebody who sets himself up as a professional arbiter needs to have high standards. In this instance, the quality of your research was unworthy of a wire service rookie, let alone a tenured professor at a prestigious university.
The substantive disagreement between Cassidy and DeLong concerns the US economy's growth prospects in mid-2002. Cassidy says they were healthy:
By the middle of 2002, however, it was clear that for whatever reason—low interest rates, the Bush tax cuts, increased military spending—the economy was staging an amazingly robust recovery.
DeLong says that Cassidy is wrong, and that "the recovery did not become anything anybody could call 'robust' in any sense until 2004."
In his note on DeLong's blog, Cassidy points out that in June 2002, the official GDP report for the first quarter of 2002 showed extremely strong growth of 5.6% – which certainly looks pretty robust on its face.
I'm not qualified to adjudicate this debate, but I can dig up some contemporaneous accounts of that GDP report. In fact, it was even stronger than Cassidy remembers: the final estimate of Q1 GDP growth, as reported by CNN Money on June 27, 2002, was a stunning 6.1%. On the other hand, no one at the time seemed to view the report as evidence of "an amazingly robust recovery" – Mark Gongloff's report card on the US economy, which was published the day after the 6.1% figure came out, concluded with an overall rating of just C+.
If I had to pick between the two sides, I think I'd come down in the middle. I don't think that the US economy was obviously doing very well in mid-2002, but I don't think that Cassidy's more upbeat view qualifies him for DeLong's "Stupidest Man Alive" crown. The cohort of economics commentators who say vastly more idiotic things than John Cassidy is legion, which implies that DeLong was too harsh on Cassidy, at least in his headline.
- Adventures in Anonymous Sourcing
- Dec 3 2008 12:27AM EST
- Extra Credit, Tuesday Edition
- Dec 2 2008 11:57PM EST
- Q
- Dec 2 2008 10:34PM EST
- Finance Salaries: A Reply
- Dec 2 2008 8:07PM EST
- The Failed Subprime Clampdown
- Dec 2 2008 4:29PM EST
- Blame Citigroup's woes on the Citi-Travelers Merger
- Dec 2 2008 2:30PM EST
- Greenberg's Chutzpah
- Dec 2 2008 12:26PM EST
- Super-Seniors: The Last Word
- Dec 2 2008 12:04PM EST
- Pay Bankers Much Less
- Dec 2 2008 10:58AM EST
- Great Moments in Politics, California Edition
- Dec 2 2008 10:35AM EST
- Super-Seniors: Your Questions Answered
- Dec 2 2008 9:52AM EST
- What's a Super-Senior Tranche?
- Dec 1 2008 9:25PM EST
- Extra Credit, Monday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 6:29PM EST
- Zimbabwe: When Even the Central Bank Can't Keep Up
- Dec 1 2008 5:07PM EST
- Genius
- Dec 1 2008 4:14PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










