Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Downside of Homeownership, Part 2
A short response to Matt Cooper, on the subject of homeownership, since I've basically said my piece at this point.
- Matt says that "the social advantages to home ownership seem well documented". I say that a society with high levels of homeownership will be a divided and unequal society. Yes, areas where people own their homes will be more stable and prosperous. But the flipside of that is that the areas where people don't own their homes will be pretty gruesome. Homeownership, on this view, is essentially an inequality perpetuation device.
- Matt has "found it hard to come up with a scenario where, over a lifetime, you'd be better off never having owned a home". Er, bankruptcy and foreclosure?
- Matt says that house-price appreciation "over a lifetime, seems inevitable even if there are long periods of stagnant or falling home prices". Tell that to people in Detroit or Flint or Baltimore, the value of whose homes have gone nowhere even during the biggest housing bubble in the history of the USA. Now think of the prospects for people who bought during the subprime boom, right at the top of the bubble. They're not pretty.
Matt might be right that buying a home is often a good idea if the chances of losing that house to foreclosure are zero, and if you intend to live in that house for the rest of your life. But those conditions are actually pretty rare.






