Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Bookstaber Looks for a Government Bailout
Rick Bookstaber thinks that bailouts – some bailouts, anyway – can be a jolly good idea. If Citadel can bail out troubled companies and make money at it, why can't the government do so as well?
To be specific, what if the government maintained a pool of capital on the ready to buy up assets of firms that are failing, much as Citadel did for Amaranth and Sowood? Of course, if a private entity is willing to step up to the plate, all the better. But as a last resort, what if the government took on the role that Citadel did in these instances. There would be no moral hazard problems, since the firm still fails. But the collateral damage would be contained; the market would be kept from going into crisis, the dominos would be kept from falling. And the taxpayer would have good odds of pocketing some profits.
One precedent which springs to mind came in August 1998, when the Hong Kong government spent $15 billion buying up stocks in an ultimately successful attempt to support the Hang Seng index.
When I was in England, an individual investor asked me where and how he could buy some of these illiquid debt products which are reportedly trading at 35 cents on the dollar or so – a very attractive price for a buy-and-hold investor who doesn't mark to market. I said that I had no idea: the financial markets have been steaming full speed ahead for many years and have basically left retail investors behind. This is a good thing in that retail stock-heavy investors really haven't suffered from the present crisis, but it's a bad thing in that all that retail money is essentially unavailable for bailout purposes.
The government, of course, is not a retail investor, and could if it wanted step in and buy up illiquid debt by the bucketload. I just can't see it happening in practice, though: the politics of deciding what to buy and what not to buy would be so fraught that economic considerations would rapidly go out the window.
While I'm at it, here's a Special Bonus Link for you: A great review of Bookstaber's book.






