The Travails of Johnson & Johnson
If there was one corner of the debt market immune from present credit woes, one would imagine it to be the market in unsecured, "natural" AAA-rated securities. And indeed Johnson & Johnson, one of those precious natural AAA credits, saw enormous demand for its $2.6 billion bond offering yesterday.
But it paid a steep price, all the same.
J&J issued three tranches of debt. The five-year bonds came at 62bp over Treasuries; the 10-years at 77bp over; and the 30-years at an eye-popping 96bp over.
In comparison, the last time that J&J came to market, its 10-year bonds were issued at 38bp over, while the 30-year bonds came at 50bp over Treasuries.
And looking at yesterday's closing levels for the Embi emerging-market bond index, we can see that Egypt is trading at 65bp over Treasuries, while Poland is trading at 70bp over. Poland has a single-A rating, while Egypt is not even investment grade.
It seems that triple-A rating is good for generating demand; it's just not so good at bringing down spreads.
Incidentally, I have a lot of sympathy for J&J in its suit against the American Red Cross. The two organizations have happily coexisted with the same trademark for many years: J&J, which had the trademark first, uses it for commercial purposes, while the Red Cross uses it for charitable purposes.
It's not like the Red Cross is ignorant of trademark issues – quite the opposite. And J&J even looked the other way as the Red Cross slapped its name and logo on all manner of commercial products, including this one. But there comes a point when J&J simply can't allow its direct competitors to use its own trademark. And that point arrived when the Red Cross started licensing out J&J's own trademark to J&J's own competitors.
It seems that the Red Cross, in typical high-handed fashion, simply refused to talk to J&J, or address the company's concerns, despite the fact that J&J is a major donor. When you behave like that, you run the risk of a lawsuit, and that's what they ended up being slapped with. The Red Cross is trying to bully J&J into stepping down; I hope the company has the cojones not to.
(Via)
- Q
- Dec 2 2008 10:34PM EST
- Finance Salaries: A Reply
- Dec 2 2008 8:07PM EST
- The Failed Subprime Clampdown
- Dec 2 2008 4:29PM EST
- Blame Citigroup's woes on the Citi-Travelers Merger
- Dec 2 2008 2:30PM EST
- Greenberg's Chutzpah
- Dec 2 2008 12:26PM EST
- Super-Seniors: The Last Word
- Dec 2 2008 12:04PM EST
- Pay Bankers Much Less
- Dec 2 2008 10:58AM EST
- Great Moments in Politics, California Edition
- Dec 2 2008 10:35AM EST
- Super-Seniors: Your Questions Answered
- Dec 2 2008 9:52AM EST
- What's a Super-Senior Tranche?
- Dec 1 2008 9:25PM EST
- Extra Credit, Monday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 6:29PM EST
- Zimbabwe: When Even the Central Bank Can't Keep Up
- Dec 1 2008 5:07PM EST
- Genius
- Dec 1 2008 4:14PM EST
- Adventures in Shopping, Black Friday Edition
- Dec 1 2008 3:55PM EST
- Endowments Dump Private Equity Stakes
- Dec 1 2008 3:22PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










