Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why a Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund Investment Might Look Attractive
Commenter tinbox has an interesting take on the news that Goldman Sachs is injecting liquidity into its own hedge funds:
It's wildly implausible that anyone looked at Goldman's fund and suddenly decided it is the best investment opportunity on the planet. That simply didn't happen. Funds down 15%+ do not attract new investors for a whole variety of reasons and this self-serving announcement addresses none of them.
Well, there's at least one good reason why a fund down 15%+ should address new investors, and it's called the high-water mark. If you think that hedge funds are a good investment, you think that they're a good investment after they've taken out their 20%-of-the-profits performance fee. Which means that they're a really good investment if you don't have to pay that fee for the first 35% that your investment goes up.
If the Goldman funds are down 26% from their high-water mark, then they will have to rise more than 35% from their present levels just to get back to it and start earning performance fees again. Which makes investments in these funds some of the cheapest hedge-fund investments available right now.
I reckon there's a very good chance that the $3 billion of liquidity being injected into Goldman's funds won't pay any performance fees unless and until those funds reach their high-water mark. If that's the case, I imagine that quite a few hedge-fund investors would be extremely interested in buying cheap exposure to what has historically been a very high-performance fund.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




