Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Let Fannie and Freddie Buy Profitable Mortgages
Is it a good idea to lift restrictions on the kind of mortgages that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy? In a word, yes. It's true that Fannie and Freddie have had accounting problems which have led their regulators to keep them on a short leash. But right now the problems in the housing market are many orders of magnitude bigger than the accounting problems at the GSEs. So it makes sense to allow those GSEs to use some of their considerable muscle on buying profitable mortgages, as Democratic senators are proposing.
Dean Baker, on the other hand, doesn't agree. He reckons that the proposal constitutes a "bailout" of hedge funds invested in mortgage-backed securities. But just because something is good for mortgage-backed securities doesn't make it a bad idea – especially not when the action is the simple lifting of a regulatory cap, rather than the expenditure of large amounts of government funds.
It's true that, at the moment, the interests of distressed homeowners (for whom we have sympathy) are aligned with the interests of leveraged investors in mortgage-backed bonds (for whom we have no sympathy). But that's no reason to do nothing to help the mortgage market.






