Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Let Fannie and Freddie Buy Profitable Mortgages
Is it a good idea to lift restrictions on the kind of mortgages that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy? In a word, yes. It's true that Fannie and Freddie have had accounting problems which have led their regulators to keep them on a short leash. But right now the problems in the housing market are many orders of magnitude bigger than the accounting problems at the GSEs. So it makes sense to allow those GSEs to use some of their considerable muscle on buying profitable mortgages, as Democratic senators are proposing.
Dean Baker, on the other hand, doesn't agree. He reckons that the proposal constitutes a "bailout" of hedge funds invested in mortgage-backed securities. But just because something is good for mortgage-backed securities doesn't make it a bad idea – especially not when the action is the simple lifting of a regulatory cap, rather than the expenditure of large amounts of government funds.
It's true that, at the moment, the interests of distressed homeowners (for whom we have sympathy) are aligned with the interests of leveraged investors in mortgage-backed bonds (for whom we have no sympathy). But that's no reason to do nothing to help the mortgage market.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





