Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

How Politicians Can Help Fix the Mortgage Mess
Hillary Clinton has a plan to address the subprime mortgage mess, and, to my surprise, it's actually eminently sensible. Andrew Leonard says that her proposals "embody a a classic Democratic approach, a big government solution that will cost money". But in fact the amount of money involved in the proposals is small: $2 billion in total. That's just a few hundred bucks, tops, per household burdened with a resetting adjustable-rate mortgage.
Clinton has seven specific proposals, none of which will solve the problem overnight, but which, taken as a package, will both help ameliorate the worst effects of the present crisis and also help prevent it from happening again. Most of them should be broadly palatable, too.
The first two proposals simply aim to inject some transparency into the murky world of mortgage brokers, which has got to be a good idea. The second two proposals help prevent borrowers from signing up for mortgages they can't afford, which is also good: while not outlawing such behavior, they would make it harder for people to do it unwittingly. The third pair of foreclosures address the current situation, and try to give some kind of help to homeowners who desperately need it. And the final proposal simply helps to build more affordable housing.
The first four proposals, then, are utterly unobjectionable, and the last three are all good ideas. Let's see if any Republicans start talking along similar lines, and we might not have to wait until 2009 to start enacting them.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





