Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Hoping Apple Allows iPhone Wifi Without Cellular Service
John Guidon, the CEO of Row 44, is a big Apple fan, he tells me, and would love to be talking to Cupertino about the iPhone problem. He's responding to my blog entry last night, when I wrote that
I hope that Guidon is talking to Apple: he says that passengers can surf the web on their iPhones – but it seems that they'll only be allowed to do so, under current regulations, if Apple allows users to turn off the cellular capability while still using the wifi functionality. At the moment, that's not possible.
The way I see it, the problem is one of economics, not technology. Apple is very keen that people not use the iPhone as a video iPod with wifi capabilities – a competitor, if you will, to the Nokia N800. The reason is that Apple is getting paid a lot of money by AT&T – rumors put the total at somewhere in the $300 per phone range, over the course of two years. And AT&T isn't going to want to pay Apple lots of money if the devices aren't used as phones.
But the problem should not be insurmountable, all the same. Apple can still require iPhone buyers to enter into a 2-year contract with Apple, at a minimum cost of $60 per month, before the unit works at all. Once they've done that, they should be able to turn off the cellphone capabilities of their phone when they're airborne – or when they're roaming internationally. Or just when they want to be able to surf the web without necessarily being contactable by anybody with their cellphone number.






