Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Crawford Hill, Exemplary Epistolizer
Required reading: Crawford Hill's letter to the rest of the Bancroft family, explaining in glorious detail how and why they deserve their fate of selling out to Rupert Murdoch. (Yes, Crawford Hill is actually a member of the Bancroft family, and not some local landmark climbed during the annual reunion. Apparently he also goes by "Bumpy".) One of many gems:
Chris Bancroft in a recent email (7.13.07) said the following: "We have been given a responsibility we never had before. Decide the fate of a business that has lasted over 100 years and is considered the best in the world."
Actually, Chris, we have had that responsibility all along. There is nothing new about having to be responsible, active and engaged owners. We, despite the attempts of a few, have not until very, very recently acted as successful owners do. We are actually now paying the price for our passivity over the past 25 years.
It's undeniable that newspapers should be owned by people who take that ownership seriously. The Bancrofts have, judging by their (in)actions over the past 25 years, failed that test. And even if they don't sell to Murdoch, there's no chance that they will suddenly become the "active and engaged owners" of Bumpy's letter. On the other hand, every Murdoch alive is consitutionally incapable of being anything but an active and engaged owner.
If you own a business, and you run it down, and someone comes along who can run it better, you should sell it. That's capitalism, that is. And I doubt anybody on the WSJ editorial page would say any different.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




