Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why the Subprime Mess Doesn't Require a Fed Rate Cut
Brad DeLong has capitulated. "I have been an optimist about the subprime market," he says. "Now I am not so sure. It no longer looks like things are as contained as I had thought... if I were on the FOMC I would start voting to cut interest rates."
It's not clear to me what datapoint(s) converted DeLong from optimist to pessimist. I hope it wasn't the blog entry he quotes headlined "$10 Billion Hedge Fund Now WORTHLESS", because that's just wrong. If a $1 billion fund controls $10 billion of assets which then decline in value to $9 billion, the whole $1 billion is wiped out – but that's only $1 billion of losses, not $10 billion of losses. There's still $9 billion of assets left over.
It's also interesting that DeLong has turned pessimistic even as the stock market is shrugging off the whole shebang and making new highs, and the non-RMBS parts of the credit markets seem to be quite deliberately and pretty quietly moving to a more sustainable and sensible footing. In other words, LBO debt and CLOs and the like are now being priced where they ought to be priced, rather than at the ridiculous levels we saw in the recent past. Call it a controlled deflation of the credit bubble, which might well prevent a catastrophic bubble-burst.
In such a situation, what would a rate cut achieve? It might be counterproductive, and reflate the credit bubble which is only now (finally, thankfully) subsiding. What's more, it wouldn't give subprime borrowers any more access to houses than they have already, since the limiting factor there is not interest rates but underwriting standards. Nothing that Brad worries about in terms of increased supply and decreased demand for housing would really change, especially considering the fact that the housing market, more than any other, is based on long-term rates in the 15-30 year range, which have shown no inclination whatsoever to react to changes at the overnight end of the curve.
I do think that regulators might want to have a close look at the foreclosure process if and when it starts affecting many more people than it ever has in the past. But cutting interest rates to help out overindebted homeowners is not going to help.






