Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Both Bear Stearns Hedge Funds Have Positive Valuations
That seems to be what the WSJ is reporting this afternoon, at least:
The assets in Bear's more-levered fund, the High-Grade Structured Credit Strategies Enhanced Leverage Fund, are worth virtually nothing, according to people familiar with the matter. The assets in the larger, less-levered fund are worth roughly 9% of the value since the end of April, these people said.
"Virtually nothing" means a small positive sum. And the larger fund seems to be clearly in the black.
This is a big piece of good news for the market, which, judging by the activity in the ABX indices yesterday, was worried that Bear would come out with some nasty figures indeed.
As it is, investors in the funds will have lost their money. But the banks which lent money to the funds will get it all back, and neither Barclays nor anybody else is going to have to suffer hundreds of millions of dollars in loan losses.
This is much better news than anybody had any reason to expect. After all, if Bear had to bail out the less-leveraged fund to the tune of $1.6 billion, what were the chances that the more-leveraged fund would still have some money left over after being liquidated? The danger of leverage, always, is that you stand to lose more – sometimes a lot more – than your initial investment. But that danger, in this case, seems to have been narrowly avoided.






