Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

How Citi Reached the Top of the M&A League Tables
How did Citigroup, which has historically been a second-tier bank when it comes to M&A advisory, manage to leapfrog the likes of Morgan Stanley and even Goldman Sachs in the M&A league tables? Obviously, Citi's sheer size had something to do with it, as Citi's M&A head Frank Yeary is happy to admit to BusinessWeek's Steve Rosenbush:
As deal sizes soared, banking clients needed access to many markets around the world, since no single market — even one as large as the U.S. — can absorb all the debt generated by a $30 billion or $40 billion deal. Moreover, multinationals doing cross-border deals required local expertise on issues such as currency, taxation, and regulation. “We saw an opportunity to be positioned as an adviser to the world’s largest and most important companies on their largest and most important deals,” Yeary said.
Interestingly, Yeary himself seems to run a pretty slim team of just 150 M&A bankers – although of course they leverage the expertise of many times that number of professionals working in debt, equity, syndication, research, compliance, etcetera.
Herding that many cats is far from trivial, so Yeary deserves one cheer for managing to do his job well enough to be considered an automatic candidate for any M&A deal.
But I suspect that the real reason Citi finds itself included in so many big deals is that big deals nearly always involve big bank loans. And Citi has long been the world leader in syndicated loans. If you want Citi to take a large chunk of your debt – and it will be harder to get your loan away if you don't – then the least you can do is throw Yeary a nominal advisory fee on the M&A part of the deal. It doesn't cost much, and it makes him very happy.
A lot of the biggest M&A deals these days are coming from the likes of Blackstone, which is in many respects an investment bank itself. Blackstone would never need or want strategic advice from Citigroup. But the fact is that it neither needs nor wants strategic advice from anyone. The world of M&A advisory is shrinking, and is being replaced by the world of debt wrangling. Which is why a shop like Perella Weinberg is having a hard time getting off the ground, and why would be investment banks like Blackstone didn't take long before transmogrifying into hedge funds or private-equity shops.
So maybe it's not so surprising that Citi is now atop the M&A league tables: the league tables simply aren't measuring advisory services any more.
(Via DealBook)






