Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Addressing Climate Change at the World Bank
"Marshall Jevons" has been watching the telly, and saw Sebastian Mallaby telling Fareed Zakaria what Robert Zoellick should be doing at the World Bank. He thinks Mallaby's on the right track (see from about 7:10 onwards):
One of the big, big challenges and opportunities for the World Bank, I think, is climate change. Because the world has got to a point where it sees there is a problem: something has to be done. At the same time, a second Kyoto kind of deal is extraordinarily unlikely and, if you had it, it would not bring in China and India, which are two of the big sources of carbon emissions now. And so you need to have something which is global, because it's a global problem, but which is short of a kind of huge great treaty. And I think brokering action through the World Bank, using the World Bank as a convener of countries from around the world, which has the technical expertise to do projects, which knows how to manage large sums of money, that is something where the World Bank can make a big difference.
Mallaby and Zakaria together then cook up a scheme whereby the G7 will give the World Bank some gazillions of dollars to bribe the Chinese and Indians into burning clean coal. (They never mention the word "sequestration", which is disappointing, since even "clean" coal emits enormous amounts of greenhouse gases, and the World Bank might be very well placed to encourage China and India to capture and store their carbon emissions underground.)
I'm not convinced that this kind of mission creep is necessarily a good idea for the Bank: it feels like a desperate casting-around for Something To Do in a context of increasing irrelevancy for the World Bank. In any case, the idea that the G7 is suddenly going to find vast amounts of money to simply give to India and China is, shall we say, even less likely than a second Kyoto treaty. If Zoellick is going to make his mark on the Bank, I think he might be well advised to continue to look at development issues and global poverty reduction, rather than disappearing off on a climate-change tangent, important though the climate-change issue is.






