Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Rupert Murdoch is Enjoying Himself
Sometimes you've just gotta love Rupert Murdoch: a man who seems to be able to hype a takeover campaign as well as Apple can hype a product launch. Here he is talking to Time's Eric Pooley, and cocking a snook at the overstuffed shirts of New York's Journalistic Establishment.
“When the Journal gets its Page 3 girls, we’ll make sure they have MBAs.”
The difference between Murdoch and someone like Arthur Sulzberger, the proprietor of the New York Times, is that Murdoch clearly loves his job, loves newspapers, and loves to enjoy himself while running a massive media company. As a result, his papers are generally a joy to read. The NYT and the WSJ and other pillars of the US establishment, by contrast, are so self-important that they become dry and humorless: the journalistic equivalent of oat bran.
Murdoch understands that in order for newspapers to survive in the 21st century, they will have to be something their readers want to read. The businessman who dutifully subscribes to the WSJ is an anachronism, but if you put unique and high-quality journalism online for free, where the whole world has access to it, you can create a formidable brand. And Murdoch's certainly thinking along those lines.
"A great, great newspaper with big, iconic names, outstanding writers, reporters, experts. And then you make it free, online only. No printing plants, no paper, no trucks. How long would it take for the advertising to come? It would be successful, it would work and you'd make ... a little bit of money. Then again, the Journal and the Times make very little money now."
The money, of course, would come from a WSJ-branded TV station: the newspaper itself would provide the brand.
If anybody is capable of reinventing the stodgy world of US broadsheet journalism, and making it relevant and vibrant in the decades to come, then Murdoch is. I'm looking forward to seeing what he'll do.
(Via Kedrosky)
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





