Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Propping Up the Blackstone Share Price
Many thanks to Calculated Risk for explaining the finer points of the greenshoe option. It turns out that those 20 million extra Blackstone shares that the lead managers sold on Monday didn't necessarily make $234 million for Steve Schwarzman personally after all. The point of a greenshoe, it seems, is to help support the price of the stock if it falls below the offering price – as BX, of course, did on Tuesday.
Of course, just because the banks can support the issue doesn't mean they are, in fact, supporting it. But if you look at the graph of the BX stock price since it fell below the $31 level, it does look very – well, horizontal. There was some volatility at the beginning of both Tuesday's and Wednesday's trading, but then on Tuesday the stock rapidly stabilized just below the $31 offer price, and on Wednesday it stabilized at or slightly above the $30 level.
All of this is consistent with the banks using the proceeds from their Monday sale of 20 million shares at $31 apiece to prevent the stock from dropping too embarrassingly. After all, total volume in BX on Tuesday was only 29.6 million shares, while volume on Wednesdsay was even lower, at 18 million.
Under the terms of a greenshoe operation, the banks can support a stock below its offering price, but they can't support it above the offering price. That, too, is consistent with the fact that BX never seems to have traded above the $31 level since the minute that level was broken on Tuesday morning.
If the banks are supporting the deal, then I was certainly wrong on Tuesday when I accused them of deserting their client. On the other hand, it would mean that Blackstone's closing price today, of $29.92 (or 3.5% below the offering price), might actually be artificially inflated. Which is a little scary, considering that the stock traded as high as $38 per share on Friday, and has already fallen more than 20% from that level over the course of four trading sessions. It would also mean that the banks early on Tuesday decided that there was far too much selling pressure at $31 to support the deal there, and decided instead to try to place a Tuesday floor slightly below the offering price. And a Wednesday floor slightly below that.
My guess – and it's only a guess – is that the banks are intervening, and that when they stop, the share price is going to fall even further. If holders of BX don't sell their shares units now, they might regret their decision in a few days' time.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





