Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Carlyle MD: The Blackstone IPO was "Highly Successful"
With Blackstone stock languishing below its offering price, few people would count the private equity firm's IPO as a smashing success. But among them, it would seem, is Carlyle Group managing director Jason Lee:
"The Blackstone IPO was highly successful. We are certainly evaluating that option as well," said Jason Lee, Carlyle's managing director and head of the group's real-estate division in Asia...
"Clearly we have to consider [an IPO] in order to be competitive," Mr. Lee said. "Our peers are obviously going to be accessing a huge amount of capital in the public market."
On the face of it, this makes little sense. A quick glance at Blackstone's share price is enough to show that the IPO was not "highly successful" in any normal sense of the term, unless a highly successful IPO is one where the firm's founders make billions while public investors lose money.
And the idea that private-equity firms need to raise equity capital "in order to be competitive" is also a bit weird. The vast majority of the proceeds from Blackstone's IPO are going not into the company, where they can be used for future deals, but rather straight into the pockets of the firm's principals. The amount of permanent equity capital that Blackstone is raising for its own corporate use is tiny, compared to the magnitude of the funds it manages.
So what on earth is Mr Lee talking about? Given that the simplest and most obvious answer is often the right one, I'm going to go with the theory that he wants to become a bona fide squillionaire himself, just like Pete Peterson and Steve Schwarzman. And right now, the easiest way to do that is to sell his company's future profits at a vast multiple to the investing public.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




