Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

How To Make $300 Million Without Really Trying
Here's an idea. (1) Spend $7.5 million on the business.com domain name. (2) ?. (3) Profit!
The crazy thing is, it seems to have worked. The bright people who bought business.com for $7.5 million in 1999 are now selling it for upwards of $300 million. What's more, they barely did anything beyond buying the domain name: they just sat back and watched the dollars roll in.
What's the moral of this story? Let's just say that when mortal enemies Nick Denton and Marc Andreessen agree, then you can pretty much be sure they're on to something.
Nick Denton, on Friday:
The Business.com site is little more than a rebadged version of Google Adwords, serving the search engine's text ads in both the main column of search results, and the sidebar, alongside a few perfunctory business listings. Business.com pages are so useless that the site is its pages don't appear in the Google index, but the search engine's text ads still fund the company. The company's pitchmen claim earnings will hit $15m this year, making the $300m pricetag quite reasonable, at least by the degraded standards of this internet boom.
So, what's the moral of the story? It certainly helps to have a domain that web newbies are likely to type into a browser address bar. And those are the internet users most likely to click on text ads. But here's the bigger lesson: search is such a lucrative business that fortunes can be made by even the most cynical of operators, with the thinnest of products, and the tiniest slice of the market.
Marc Andreessen, on Monday:
In a great market -- a market with lots of potential customers and/or a highly growing set of potential customers -- the market pulls product out of the startup. The market needs to be fulfilled and the market will be fulfilled, by the first viable product that comes along. The product doesn't need to be great; it just has to basically work. The market doesn't care how good the team is, as long as the team can produce that viable product. In short, customers are knocking down your door to get the product; the main goal is to actually answer the phone and respond to all the emails from people who want to buy. This is the story of search keyword advertising, and Internet auctions, and TCP/IP routers...
Monster market, weak product, terrible team -- startup will probably be a huge success, as long as the team can do the basics of getting the weak product out and fulfilling the customer orders. The market pulls the product and the team.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





