Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Blackstone Deserted By Its Own Bankers
What do equity underwriters do? Well, in the most basic definition of the term, they underwrite a stock offering – that is, they pledge to buy shares at a certain price if the public turns out not to have any appetite. Essentially, they're putting their corporate reputations on the line, and saying that a certain stock is worth what they say it's worth, and that if push comes to shove they'll put their money where their mouth is and buy it at that price.
Which means that if you have seventeen different underwriters on a deal, and they all say that a certain stock is worth (say) $31 per share, there's bound to be a pretty strong bid at that level. Right?
Er, not so much. If you look at how BX has been performing today, the $31 level seems to be more of an intraday cap than an intraday floor. The banks are more than happy to sell stock at that price – indeed, they exercised their greenshoe yesterday and raised another $620 million for Blackstone (of which, naturally, they're keeping $22 million for themselves).
If the banks won't support a deal on the day after they exercise a greenshoe, how on earth do they justify their fees, no matter how "discounted" the 3.6% rate is? And what point could there possibly be in hiring everybody and their mother to help sell the deal? Yes, the stock markets in general have been falling, but nothing like as much as Blackstone has been: it's now almost 30% lower than the first price it traded at on Friday.
This IPO is bad news for any other private-equity shop looking to go public, yes. But it's also bad news for Wall Street, which has now revealed just how quickly it's willing to desert a client whose offering isn't quite going according to plan.






