Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Murdoch Closer to Acquiring Dow Jones
The NYT's 3,900-word investigation of Rupert Murdoch lands with a thud this morning, and there's really nothing there. HuffPo would have it that the "NYT Savages Murdoch"; if so, then, as Dennis Healy once said, this is like being savaged by a dead sheep. There's certainly nothing in the article to derail Murdoch's deal to buy Dow Jones, which seems to have taken one step back and two steps forward over the course of the weekend.
Meanwhile, not to be outdone, Ken Auletta has 7,375 words on Murdoch and Dow Jones in the latest New Yorker. He's clearly skeptical that Murdoch will be able to keep himself out of interfering with the Journal's editorial affairs:
In 1995, I spent several months reporting for a Profile of Murdoch for The New Yorker. During ten days in his offices, I attended meetings, witnessed negotiations, listened to his phone calls, and conducted about twenty hours of taped interviews with him. At least a couple of times each day, he talked on the phone with an editor in order to suggest a story based on something that he’d heard. This prompted me to ask, “Of all the things in your business empire, what gives you the most pleasure?”
“Being involved with the editor of a paper in a day-to-day campaign,” he answered instantly. “Trying to influence people.”
On the other hand, he points out that even the New York Times isn't immune from the influence of its owner:
“It’s in choosing editors that Arthur [Sulzberger] gets what he wants,” observed Daniel Okrent, who was the Times’ first Public Editor. “And not just the executive editor, Bill Keller. I don’t think Keller would pick, say, a foreign editor that Arthur did not approve of. Also, any executive editor of the New York Times knows that among the things Arthur cares about most are race and gender equality.”
It looks very likely that we'll see for ourselves just how hands-on Murdoch will be as an owner of the WSJ. Certainly there seems to be a good chance that he would make WSJ.com free, which would be a wonderful move.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





