Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Newly-Normal Treasury Curve: Good News or Bad News?
Are you relieved that the US yield curve is sloping upwards again? I am. For the first time in years, there's an obvious and safe place where people can invest their money: Treasury bonds. They felt ridiculously overpriced for years, bid up by foreign central banks and by a dearth of other places to invest, but the recent sell-off has finally made it possible to get comfortably over 5% on your money over pretty much any time horizon, completely risk-free.
Of course, there's a catch. James Stewart:
The problem is that the conventional wisdom about yield curves and the economy has been stood on its head in recent years, and no one has yet offered a convincing explanation why...
No less an authority than former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan called the recent inverted yield curve a "conundrum." That's because the Fed's campaign to raise short-term rates led to lower, rather than higher, long-term rates. Do we now have the makings of a new conundrum, higher long-term rates that remain so in the face of slower growth or even Fed cuts? (...)
I don't think investors should underestimate the significance of a sustained rise in long-term rates to an economy that has become gorged on easy credit.
In other words, if times were good when the curve was inverted – and, yes, times were very good indeed – then it's entirely consistent to think that times might be bad now that the yield curve looks "normal" again.
And there's one thing which remains abnormal about the current situation. While risk-free rates have spiked up substantially, credit spreads have barely budged. The whole market, it seems, is waiting for the other shoe to drop, and for spread markets to widen out in line with the new higher-interest-rate environment. But it hasn't happened yet.
That's either cause for relief, or cause for worry. I tend towards the latter: if the yield curve is starting to look normal, the spread curve is likely to move back to a more normal shape too, sooner or later. I'd be much happier in Treasuries right now than in credit.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





