Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Yahoo: Terry Out, Jerry In, No Real Change
I have a feeling that all this excitement about Terry Semel's ouster at Yahoo will be seen in retrospect to be overblown. (To give you an idea of how big a deal this is, Nick Denton at Valleywag has devoted his last seven posts to the news.)
The company is now in play, or at least the market thinks it is, Jerry Yang's protestations to the contrary notwithstanding. But the problem with Semel was not that he was unwilling to sell the company; the problem with Semel was that he was an Old Media guy who was never really fast enough to keep Yahoo new and vibrant.
And if it's fast, new and vibrant you want, I really don't think that Yang's your man. Denton actually nails it:
Yahoo's press release, announcing the management putsch at Yahoo, is one of the most nauseating examples of corporate doublespeak I've read in a long while. "Yang and Decker to Focus on Realizing Yahoo!'s Strategic Vision by Accelerating Execution, Further Strengthening Leadership and Fostering a Culture of Winning." This attempt to spin, in the most desperate of situations, isn't clever; it's pathetic, and emblematic of a company still in deep denial about its defeat by Google.
Can you remotely imagine Google putting out a press release like that? Excessive corporate-speak is a sign that you haven't got a clue what you're actually meant to be doing, and instead start talking like this:
What is that vision? A Yahoo! that executes with speed, clarity and discipline. A Yahoo! that increases its focus on differentiating its products and investing in creativity and innovation. A Yahoo! that better monetizes its audience. A Yahoo! whose great talent is galvanized to address its challenges.
The depressing thing is that I'm not quoting Semel, here: I'm quoting Yang. In his own blog. Anybody who writes on his own blog about "operational excellent mentality" and "critical initiatives" and galvanized talent is a CEO with a passel of management consultants instead of a vision. The guy's not even 40 yet and already he's talking like this? Maybe becoming a billionaire does that to you.






