Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Taxing Paris Hilton
I've never been particularly on board with the concept of guest bloggers, especially if they have a reasonably high profile. They often don't really get the concept of blogging, and instead of writing about what they're reading about, they have a tendency instead to write about what they're writing about. This can take the form of plugging their own books, or, in the case of Jason Furman today, plugging his institution's own research reports. On the other hand, I'm glad Jason did so, because the paper he's plugging, by NYU Law professor Lily Batchelder, is a really good one.
Batchelder proposes that the estate tax, which is going to fall to zero in 2010 only to start increasing again in 2011, should instead return in a significantly different guise: an inheritance tax. The difference is that estate taxes are paid by estates – the dead, basically – while inheritance taxes are paid by inheritors, who are alive. And it turns out that in reality there's a big difference in terms of who gets affected. Under the estate tax, poor people with small inheritances from large estates suffer from large effective tax rates, while many large inheritances don't get taxed at all.
Under an inheritance tax, by contrast, inherited income would be treated in much the same way as any other income, whether earned or unearned or won in the state lottery. Although the first $2.3 million of inherited income would still come tax-free.
Furman sums it up by saying that we should tax "Paris Hilton, not Britney Spears" – ie, tax the idle members of the lucky-sperm club, rather than people who actually make a lot of money themselves.
The irony is that Paris Hilton is actually a money-making machine, whose earned income vastly exceeds that of Furman, Batchelder, and indeed all of the other contributors to the Free Exchange blog as well. To get an idea of the sort of money Hilton makes, have a look at the D-list version of Paris Hilton: England's Tara Palmer-Tomkinson, who apparently earns some $2.5 million in a good year. An A-lister like Paris Hilton, with her own perfume line on sale at Target, undoubtedly gets much, much more.
I'm all in favor of taxing unearned, inherited wealth. But there's a good chance that Paris is going to make more money on her own than she'll ever inherit from her parents.






