Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Quebec Taxes Carbon
The tax, believed to be the first of its kind in Canada, will tax 0.8 cents on every litre of gas sold in Quebec and will raise about $200-million a year to finance the province's green plan to reduce greenhouse gases.
The province will also slap a tax of 0.9 cents on each litre of diesel sold.
The plan was created to help Quebec reach its Kyoto protocol targets, which is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2012.
I'll do the conversion so you don't have to: 0.8 Canadian cents per liter works out at 2.85 US cents per gallon. By global gasoline-tax standards, this is tiny, and will almost certainly have zero impact on gasoline consumption. And the gasoline tax is going to account for over a third of Quebec's total carbon-tax revenues. So the chances of this carbon tax having any appreciable effect on demand for carbon are slim indeed.
This is why countries need a three-pronged approach if they're going to effectively reduce their carbon emissions. A gasoline tax does make quite a lot of sense, but a cap-and-trade system is better for other carbon emitters. And finally, regulation is necessary too, as Quebec knows:
By year-end, the government will unveil emission regulations requiring manufacturers of light-duty vehicles sold in Quebec to meet the so-called California standard for greenhouse gas emissions beginning in 2010. The California standard will result in reducing greenhouse gas emissions for new vehicles by between 25 per cent and 30 per cent by 2016, according to government projections.
Quebec's carbon tax, then, isn't really Pigovian, because it isn't large enough to noticeably reduce carbon emissions. But it's a good start, since it's always easier to increase a "sin tax" than it is to implement one initially.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




