Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Rupert Murdoch Suddenly Looks Very Smart Again
So, the Bancrofts are willing to sell off the family silver after all. But their official statement is hilarious:
As we have been since 1902, the Bancroft family remains resolute in its commitment to preserve and protect the editorial independence and integrity of The Wall Street Journal...
After a detailed review of the business of Dow Jones and the evolving competitive environment in which it operates, the family has reached consensus that the mission of Dow Jones may be better accomplished in combination or collaboration with another organization, which may include News Corporation.
"Resolute in its commitment"? As Inigo Montoya might say, "I do not think that word means what you think it means". Or, as Withnail might say, "that represents a level of hypocrisy that I'd previously suspected, but not noticed due to highly evasive skills".
I was a fan of the Murdoch bid from the beginning, but lost heart a week ago, when the News Corp chairman was economical with the truth in an interview with the FT. I do think, however, that the Journal will ultimately be a greater and more successful newspaper under Murdoch than it would be if it continued to be run by a series of incompetent Dow Jones managers.
The Bancrofts are clearly still holding out some hope for a white knight who can come along and save them from having to sell to Rupert. And $5 billion is a low enough price that I'm sure there's a billionaire or two out there who might be tempted. But billionaires tend not to be the hands-off type, which is exactly the sort of person the Bancrofts are looking for. Warren Buffett would be perfect, but he's not going to bid. Which means there's now a very good chance that Murdoch will end up with his glorious prize.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





