The RBS Consortium's Huge Financing Line
There's good news for shareholders in ABN Amro today: the consortium led by Royal Bank of Scotland has officially said that it will pay €71.1 billion ($95.7 billion) for the Dutch bank. The even better news is that 79% of the bid is in cash.
But what's good news for the target is not always good news for the bidders, and the huge cash component of their bid means that they have a lot of work to do in both the debt and equity markets. On the equity side, RBS and Fortis will both issue €15 billion in new shares, while Santander will issue €10 billion. On the debt side, a lot of the financing seems to be coming from the issuance of new Tier 1 capital, which is the most expensive type of debt that a bank can raise. RBS is issuing €6 billion, and Fortis is issuing €5 billion.
The banks say they have financing lined up -- and I'm sure they do. But I'm equally sure they haven't locked down pricing on these new securities, and there's always a chance they might get an unwelcome surprise. Look at what happened to Tribune, after it was acquired by Sam Zell. According to DealBook, the debt part of the deal was much harder to raise than had been anticipated:
Tribune sold more than $7 billion in loans last week to fund the tender offer as part of the deal and to refinance some existing debt, the paper said. But the company reportedly had to agree to higher interest rates than planned on most of the debt and to pay down some loans within two years, rather than the seven-year term it sought.
This could be a sign of investors finally drawing a line in the sand. I think the chances of there being serious repercussions for RBS, however, are slim. Banks' Tier 1 capital is extremely junior and subordinated, to be sure, which does make it more expensive. But no European bank has defaulted on its Tier 1 debt in living memory, and there's a general feeling in the market that banks the size of RBS are simply too big to fail in such a manner. I have a feeling the bidders, if their bid is accepted, will get pretty attractive terms.
- TIPS Strips, Redux
- Nov 20 2008 11:57AM EST
- Can GMAC Save GM?
- Nov 20 2008 11:42AM EST
- Ugly
- Nov 20 2008 10:06AM EST
- Zimbabwe Datapoint of the Day
- Nov 19 2008 8:54PM EST
- Extra Credit, Wednesday Edition
- Nov 19 2008 5:51PM EST
- Will Berkshire Lose its Triple-A?
- Nov 19 2008 2:52PM EST
- Citi: From Bad to Worse
- Nov 19 2008 1:18PM EST
- Yet More Paulson Revisionism
- Nov 19 2008 12:29PM EST
- Investing in Africa and Ecuador
- Nov 19 2008 11:06AM EST
- Blogonomics: Conflicts of Interest
- Nov 19 2008 9:57AM EST
- The Return of the $70 Per Hour Meme
- Nov 18 2008 10:49PM EST
- Extra Credit, Tuesday Edition
- Nov 18 2008 4:45PM EST
- Yes, Fund Managers Really Do Underperform
- Nov 18 2008 3:42PM EST
- The Deteriorating Bond Market
- Nov 18 2008 3:00PM EST
- Watches: Don't Trust the Auctions
- Nov 18 2008 12:26PM EST
Categories
Links
- Email Felix Salmon
- Alphaville

- Marginal Revolution

- The Panelist

- FP Passport

- Overcoming Bias

- Andrew Leonard

- Barry Ritholtz

- Brad Setser

- Carbon Tax Center

- Calculated Risk

- Greg Mankiw

- Free Exchange

- Dean Baker

- Alexander Campbell

- Kash Mansori

- The Bayesian Heresy

- A Fistful of Euros

- John Quiggin

- Michael Mandel

- Lance Knobel

- Mark Thoma

- Dan Gross

- Curbed

- Streetsblog

- Chris Anderson

- Deal Journal

- MarketBeat

- DealBook

- DealBreaker

- Carl Bialik

- Michelle Leder

- Brad DeLong

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Naked Capitalism

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- Econospeak

- Fortune: Daily Briefing

- Financial Crookery










