Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

On Central Bankers' Circumspection
Add Bank of England governor Mervyn King to the list of people thinking that Alan Greenspan should shut up, already:
Asked during a news conference about Greenspan's behavior, King said that he was grateful that his own predecessor has kept silent about the economy and that he would follow that precedent when he stepped down.
"I am very grateful to Eddie George for not being on the radio or in the newspapers commenting on what the Monetary Policy Committee is doing," King said.
This is, actually, a very good reason for Greenspan to stay silent. But I still support Greenspan's right to say whatever he likes, and part of the reason comes down to the differences between Alan Greenspan and Eddie George. While Greenspan delighted in being cryptic, George was a much more straightforward, copper-bottomed type of chap. While Greenspan could say nothing at enormous and mind-boggling length, George was much happier saying nothing by saying nothing.
If Eddie George said something about UK monetary policy, then, it could make life rather uncomfortable for his successor. Given that Greenspan was never very good at explaining what he was doing when he did have power, it would be harder for him to be very convincing in terms of second-guessing his successor now that he doesn't.






