Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Will the Next World Bank President Be Another Bush Crony?
This isn't the first time that Bill Frist has been mentioned as a possible World Bank president, but it might be the first time he's been called a favorite for the nomination. I think that Blake Hounshell is right and that the WSJ article is "likely a trial balloon floated by the White House". What's more, it's a trial balloon which deserves and early and emphatic popping. Frist would be an atrocious choice, and frankly I can't see him getting much traction with a World Bank board which is not exactly sympathetic to Bush cronies these days.
The non-trial-balloon part of Hitt's article, I think, is this:
White House spokesman Tony Fratto declined to comment on specific candidates, but did say President Bush hopes to have names to consider soon. "The president intends to name an American to the post," Mr. Fratto said.
That seems pretty unambiguous, although it is of course also depressing. Fratto, a former Treasury flack, knows whereof he speaks, and he seems pretty keen to close the door on any possibility of the Bush administration nominating a non-American.
Even if Bush does nominate an American, though, he really doesn't need to nominate someone divisive, with more ties to the Bush administration than to the World Bank or the development community. Is there not an ounce of sense in the White House?






