Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

African Nations Need to Grow Up
Sometimes even the world's most ardent UN supporters have to despair, and this, it would seem, is one of those times. In a secret ballot (!), the UN Commission on Sustainable Development has voted to elect Zimbabwe as its chair. You couldn't make it up.
The BBC's Laura Trevelyan, in her video report, explains that the member countries are exhibiting all the sophistication and maturity of a bunch of 10-year-old girls:
It may seem strage that Zimbabwe's won this election, but this isn't just about one country, it's more about relations between the developed world and the developing world. Once the European Union started lobbying against Zimbabwe, even those nations with doubts didn't want to be seen to be told what to do by the wealthy world. And that helps explain Zimbabwe's victory.
What's not explained is how on earth Zimbabwe became the African nominee in the first place -- that, too, seems to have been a function of trying to piss as many people off as much as possible. It just boggles the mind that Africa's diplomats and politicians, who have been agitating for years to have more ownership of development programs on their continent, would turn around and nominate Zimbabwe as the chair of a development committee. It's almost as though they want to prove to the world that they simply don't care about murder, corruption, poverty and famine.






