Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

White House Still Well Behind the Wolfowitz Curve
The attempts by the Bush administration to do right by Paul Wolfowitz are touching, if laughably inadequate. Apparently the latest trial balloon being floated by the White House is that Wolfowtiz gets absolved on the grounds of "acting in good faith", and then, maybe, at some unspecified point in the future, he resigns (or doesn't) on fluffier grounds associated with his leadership.
Not only is this idea clearly about a month too late, it also ignores the fact that the Bank's board has already found Wolfowitz guilty, not to mention the fact that Wolfowitz's whiny pleas yesterday went into no little detail about how he wanted to change his leadership style – thereby giving him a loophole which would allow him, under the proposed US deal, to stay on.
Steven Weisman, of the New York Times, does raise one hope with his choice of words, only to dash it later on in the sentence:
It appeared that the best the administration could hope for was the possibility of President Bush appealing personally to Prime Minister Tony Blair, with whom he is scheduled to meet at the White House on Wednesday, and to other elected leaders.
I can't imagine that there would be much opposition if Bush could persuade Blair to replace Wolfowitz. But that option, it seems, is not on the table.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





