Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Using Credit Cards Abroad
One of the more annoying of the world's bank charges is the fee that banks charge you when you make a purchase on your credit card overseas. In fact, there are often three fees:
- The 1% fee which Visa and Mastercard charge the issuing bank, and which is usually passed on to the cardholder;
- An extra fee of up to 2% charged by the issuing bank for no obvious reason; and
- The hidden fees which may or may not be found lurking inside the exchange rate conversion.
Bankrate.com has a good overview of how the first two fees differ from issuer to issuer: Bank of America and Citibank charge a total of 3% after conversion to US dollars, for instance, while Wachovia and WaMu charge 1%, and Capital One actually eats the charge from Visa and Mastercard and charges 0%. As for the stand-alone cards, American Express charges 2% while Discover charges 0%.
Not a single bank would tell Bankrate why they might charge more than 1%, maybe because they were embarrassed to admit it was just a scheme for making money without any effort.
But I'd be very interested to see not how the fees compare in theory, but how they compare in practice. If you bought four identically-priced items overseas at exactly the same time, using a Visa card, a Mastercard, an Amex card and a Discover card, how would your charges differ? Discover, with its 0% fee, might look like the best option – but if it whacks you on the exchange rate, you might be better off elsewhere.
There are two reasons I'm a little bit suspicious of Discover's 0% fee, and they both come down to the fact that the Discover card is basically a US card, not a global one. As a result, relatively few overseas locations accept it in the first place, which means that currency conversion is less easy and common for Discover than it is for other cards. More importantly, there's no netting out: while lots of Americans use their Discover cards abroad, there aren't any Europeans, say, using their Discover cards in the US. So every time a Discover cardholder makes a purchase, Discover really does need to convert dollars into that foreign currency.
Visa, Mastercard, and Amex, on the other hand, have revenues in lots of different currencies on a daily basis. If American cardholders spend $1 million in Europe on the same day that European cardholders spend $1 million in America, everything can pretty much cancel itself out, and no actual FX trade needs to be done.
Still, this is all very theoretical. Does anybody know how and whether FX conversion rates differ in practice?
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




