Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
Murdoch Takes Another Shot at Wooing Bancrofts
Rupert Murdoch has reportedly offered the Bancroft family a seat on the News Corp board as part of his campaign to get them to sell him Dow Jones. I can't see what good that would do, frankly. He's not offering them News Corp stock, and the Wall Street Journal will be such a tiny part of News that it would probably only come up peripherally at board meetings. And the Bancrofts, as the Journal itself has done a very good job of reporting, are hardly monolithic enough to benefit from a single seat in any event.
Murdoch clearly hasn't given up, but efforts like this seem unlikely to make much of a difference. An editorial board which would need to approve the hiring and firing of the WSJ editor? Would hardly stop Rupert from badgering the editor with phone calls day and night should he be so inclined. And Murdoch's promises to invest extra money into the Journal's Washington, New York and international operations do risk coming across as though he's accusing the Bancrofts of mismanaging their crown jewel.
On the other hand, Dow Jones stock was trading below $52 today before news of Murdoch's letter came out. Maybe what Murdoch really needs is a credible threat of withdrawing his offer. The problem, of course, is that nobody would believe it.
