Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

This is a Bull Market, Not a Bubble
Tim Price is pondering the difference between bubbles and bull markets.
To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail. To a perennial bear, all rising assets look like a bubble. In a widely reported commentary (“It’s everywhere, in everything: the first truly global bubble”), GMO’s Jeremy Grantham sees bubbles across the board, “From Indian antiquities to modern Chinese art; from land in Panama to Mayfair; from forestry, infrastructure, and the junkiest bonds to mundane blue chips; it’s bubble time!”
I'm inclined to believe that if everything is a bubble, nothing is a bubble. Or, to put it another way, what we're seeing is not global asset prices going through the roof, so much as the cost of money continuing to fall – which means that the value of art or land or stocks goes down, in money terms.
In turn, that means that the American consumer, complete with famously negative savings rate, is being eminently sensible. Why save money if it's going to buy less tomorrow than it will buy today? This used to be a problem in the days of price inflation; now it's a problem in the days of asset-price inflation. The thing is that even as assets have gone up in price, real consumer goods have not. So spending $2,000 on a cheap flat-screen TV becomes, on a relative basis, much more attractive than investing $2,000 in an expensive bond fund.
I also agree with Tim that virtually no asset class right now, with a couple of small exceptions such as green energy, really looks very much like a bubble. Most of us still vividly remember the dot-com bubble, which was a bubble, where individuals would buy stocks in the hope that they would go up by ten times or more. Similarly there has been something of a speculative housing bubble in some areas – Miami springs to mind – where similar returns could be made by flipping property you never intended to move into. (You buy a $1 million apartment with a $50,000 downpayment. You sell the apartment for $1.5 million: you make ten times your original investment. Rinse and repeat.)
But I don't see that kind of greed in most asset classes, and certainly not in the debt markets, where valuations seem to be the most out of whack. What we're in right now is a bull market, not a bubble. And although both bull markets and bubbles do come to an end, the chances of a disastrous crash are much lower in the former case than in the latter.






