Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Microsoft-Yahoo: Move Along, Nothing Here
On Friday, there was a lot of heat, if relatively little light, surrounding prospects of some kind of a "possible merger or other matchup" between Yahoo and Microsoft. Much ink was spilled, and in a rather surprising turn of events Henry Blodget, of all people, seemed to have the best analysis.
I left the story alone, partly because I was at a conference away from wifi for most of the day, partly because I didn't have much to say about it, and partly because the whole thing just felt a little bit feverish and silly. The New York Post does break the occasional business story, but nothing as huge as a Microsoft-Yahoo merger. And even the Post didn't seem to place much weight on the story, burying it as it did on page 34.
In the end, the story turns out to have been a non-starter from the beginning. Robert Guth and Kevin Delaney of the WSJ reported on Sunday that yes, there were talks, but that "the merger discussions are no longer active". It's not clear when the talks took place, or how serious they were, but anybody who bought Yahoo on Friday in expectation of a takeover is likely going to be a seller when the markets open on Monday.
The lesson here is one of the oldest: don't let yourself be distracted by intraday noise. People who are glued to the markets all day burn far too many cycles on the kind of stuff that simply doesn't matter for anybody with a time horizon longer than a couple of days. Investors, certainly, shouldn't care about this kind of thing – only traders and the sell-side have any real reason to try to keep on top of such matters.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




