Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Envisioning a Canadian Reuters
The FT's Alphaville is doing a good job of moving the Reuters takeover story along, giving not only details of Reuters' "Founders Share", which prevents hostile takeover bids, but also a plausible description of who's saying what: apparently Canada's Thomson offered 600p per share, and Reuters replied they would only start talking at 750p per share.
The bid can be seen as some kind of vindication for Reuters CEO Tom Glocer, who has made his company more attractive than it was only a couple of years ago. On the other hand, the share price has hardly taken off – until today – and the venerable Reuters, mortifyingly, continues to have a smaller share of the market for financial data than the upstart Bloomberg.
Reuters is a news company by brand, but a financial-data company by revenue. Both sides of the company have a reputation of being very high quality, if slightly boring. Being owned by Thomson, which is also a little on the boring side, wouldn't be such a bad thing, although I'm not sure how the UK hacks will take the news.
My guess is that if Thomson does bag Reuters, it'll actually change its name to Reuters as well: one could argue that it's the world's strongest brand in the business of news.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





