Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Moving a Carbon Tax Towards Cap-and-Trade
We've already seen that a cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions is superior to a carbon tax. But it's not an either/or thing. If you want some of the benefits of a tax from a cap-and-trade system, that's easy: just increase the amount of emission rights that you auction, and decrease the amount that you freely allocate.
On the other hand, it's hard to get the benefits of cap-and-trade from a carbon tax, because a carbon tax simply can't implement the main feature of a cap-and-trade system, which is the cap on carbon emissions.
Still, Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki and Liberal Party leader Stephan Dion do have one interesting idea which brings a carbon tax closer to a cap-and-trade system:
Liberal Leader Stephan Dion also rejected the $195 figure as excessive, saying that his party proposes a $20-per-tonne "deposit" instead of a tax.
"It's a deposit that the companies will have to give to the environmental bank -- and they will have this money back if they decrease their emissions," Dion told Question Period co-host Jane Taber.
"It's like when you have your bottle of Coca-Cola and you bring it back to the grocery store. You get your money back. It's not a tax."
Dion called his plan a "great incentive" for Canadians to reduce emissions while not harming the economy.
If you don't like the idea of a carbon tax, maybe this will help bring you around. I'm not sure entirely how the plan is meant to work, but it seems a little bit like the cap-and-trade system in that you can get financial benefits from reducing emissions. That said, it also seems like a cap-and-trade system which is governed not by market mechanisms but rather by a government bureaucracy. And I can't say I'm too excited about that.






