Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Bancrofts: More Split Than They Might Seem
How split are the Bancrofts, on the subject of the News Corp bid for Dow Jones? Floyd Norris, behind the Times subscription firewall, has been working his way through the Dow Jones proxy on file at the SEC. Here's what we knew already: the Bancrofts control 64.2% of the votes, and Bancrofts representing 52% of the votes are opposed to the deal. Which means that about 81% of Bancrofts are opposed, which doesn't sound like there's much of a split.
But look a little deeper, says Norris:
Many of the family shares are tied up in family trusts. I assume that a majority of the trustees are on board for rejection, so all of those shares are against this deal, at least for now.
If that is true, then about 28 percent of the votes are in shares held directly by family members — or in foundations that they control. And if 12 percent of them have not signed on, that would leave 16 percent that have agreed.
That leaves more than 40 percent of the family, as measured by votes, not on board.
And that is a lot of dissension.
Maybe this is the genius behind the timing of the Murdoch bid. Yes, the Bancrofts control more than 64% of Dow Jones voting rights. But the Bancroft family trusts only control 36% of those rights; the rest of the Bancroft votes are in the hands of individual family members. And everybody who's ever been a member of a family knows that individual family members don't always act in concert with each other.
As the Bancroft family gets younger and more dipersed, its solidarity will necessarily fracture. Now might well be the point at which family members who have no managerial role in the company decide that a lot of money now is preferable to very little money in the future, as an independent Dow Jones continues its inevitable and inexorable decline. Yes, the Wall Street Journal is something to be inordinately proud of: it's on everybody's list of the top five newspapers in the world. So maybe the selfless thing to do is to sell it to someone who has a better chance of giving it a rosy future.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





