Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why the Size of the Derivatives Market is Cause for Worry
Steve Waldman has a really great post on derivatives, which clearly and compellingly sets out the Case for Worry.
The gist is that in a $300 trillion derivatives market, there's bound to be a lot of counterparty risk somewhere. And given how the market is set up, one major counterparty failure could set off a nasty global chain reaction, with serious systemic consequences.
Another way of looking at it: what is that $300 trillion made up of? Let's say that everything is double-counted, and that you can somehow carve it up ito +$150 trillion of positions on one side and -$150 trillion of positions on the other. Then in theory the two add up to zero, and there's no risk. But in the real world, when you take sums as mind-bogglingly enormous as $150 trillion and try to add them up, you'll never be perfectly accurate, and there's likely to be a tiny error in there somewhere. Let's say that tiny error nets out at one tenth of one percent of the total. Well, that tiny error is now a whopping great $300 billion risk.






