Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Sallie Forth to a BB Rating
If you bought the rumor on Friday that Sallie Mae was about to go private, you're feeling pretty smug this morning. Sure, SLM shares closed at $46.76 on Friday, up almost 15% on the day. But now it turns out that Christopher Flowers and his consortium are willing to pay $60 for them, valuing the student lender at $25 billion.
There are echoes of the TXU buyout here: both companies are in politically fraught and unpopular industries, and private equity is stepping up where public shareholders have proved themselves fearful. (Sallie Mae was trading at $55 per share last summer.)
Flowers, along with fellow-bidders JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Friedman Fleischer & Lowe, is making a long-term bet on Sallie Mae and trusting that the political firestorm in New York and Washington will blow over sooner or later.
Flowers is probably right, but it's a risky bet all the same. Sallie Mae makes a lot of money by lending money to students and then getting Uncle Sam to pay it back in the event of default. If the government ever tires of subsidizing the private sector in this way, no amount of "private student loans" – loans made outside the federal guarantee program – are likely to be able to justify the $25 billion price tag.
The most interesting part of the deal, however, is not the politics so much as the financial engineering. Sallie Mae, like most lenders, has relatively little debt, mainly because it feels it needs a rock-solid credit rating in order to minimize its borrowing costs. But all that is about to change now: this deal is being done with $16.5 billion in new debt, which could well bring Sallie Mae all the way down to junk high-yield status.
And where will Sallie find the money to lend out if it has a double-B credit rating? Why, its shareholders, of course: JP Morgan and BofA have promised a credit line of as much as $200 billion if the bond markets prove recalcitrant.
In 1997, Sallie Mae was a government agency with a triple-A rating. Five years later, it was down to single-A. Five years after that, it's likely to be down to BBB at the highest. That's progress, that is.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





