Recent Blog Posts
-
"Wal-Mart" of Weed Welcomed to Washington
Jan 23 201210:57 am EDT -
Stick a Fork in This App, Paula Deen
Jan 20 20124:22 pm EDT -
Germ-Zapping Keyboard Approved for Hospitals
Jan 03 20124:32 pm EDT -
Sacramento Feds Look to Bag Pot Growers
Nov 15 20113:18 pm EDT -
Sofinnova Finds Unexpected Investor Interest in Health Care
Oct 17 20113:39 pm EDT -
A Sick Statistic: Health Care Costs Soar
Sep 27 20113:33 pm EDT -
Watson Goes to Work on Health Care
Sep 12 201112:01 pm EDT -
National Health Plan Relieves Businesses' Insurance Headaches
Aug 24 20118:14 am EDT -
Go to Work, Fight Off Depression
Aug 22 201111:36 am EDT -
Startup Blazes New Trail for Marijuana Research
Aug 19 20114:20 pm EDT
Vioxx Effects Still Linger For Merck
Merck & Co. is still trying to put its Vioxx problems behind it.
A week before the Supreme Court hears from angry shareholders, a new study says the company had strong evidence of the risks of Vioxx years before the drug was pulled.
In a study published today, researchers found that the heart risks associated with Vioxx, linked to tens of thousands of deaths, could have been identified almost four years before Merck pulled the drug from the market in 2004.
Joseph Ross of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and a group of several researchers, all consultants paid by plaintiffs' lawyers suing Merck, studied 30 Vioxx trials the drug maker conducted at the beginning of the decade. The researchers obtained the trial information after it was made available through litigation brought against Merck. The researchers' findings were published today in the Archives of Internal Medicine.
Ross and his team found that after 21 of the 30 studies were completed by December 2000, there was concern patients taking Vioxx were at greater risk for death caused by heart conditions. As of June 2001, data showed there was a 35 percent increase in risk of heart attack or death in patients taking Vioxx.
Merck says the researchers used "unreliable methods and reached incorrect conclusions."
Next week, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear from shareholders who want to sue Merck for not disclosing the risks associated with Vioxx. The drug maker has agreed to pay out almost $5 billion in settlements in patient cases.
Brett Chase covers health care for Portfolio.com and writes the blog Heavy Doses.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




