Recent Blog Posts
-
Michelle Obama Targets Fat Kids
Feb 09 201011:09 am EDT -
Crestor Cholesterol Drug Gets a Boost
Feb 09 20109:25 am EDT -
Study Links Soft Drinks to Cancer
Feb 08 20108:40 am EDT -
A Breakthrough for Diabetic Monitors
Feb 05 20109:04 am EDT -
Medical Malpractice Law Struck Down in Illinois
Feb 04 201010:47 am EDT -
U.S. Pays Bigger Chunk of Health Care Tab
Feb 04 20109:00 am EDT -
SIDS Linked to Chemical in Brain
Feb 03 20109:00 am EDT -
Study Linking Vaccine to Autism Pulled
Feb 02 20105:25 pm EDT -
Virginia to Obama: We Don't Want Health Reform
Feb 02 201012:45 pm EDT -
Herbal Remedies Pose Danger for Heart Patients
Feb 02 20109:10 am EDT
Your Money or Your Life for Mammogram Change?
Are the new guidelines on breast cancer checkups really going to save the health care system much money?
Hospital prices for the test vary widely. A check of hospitals in Chicago showed most in the range of $100 to $200. That's hardly the most expensive medical procedure and not a big profit driver, says Shawn Farley, a spokesman for the American College of Radiology.
In fact, free-standing clinics lose money on mammograms because the reimbursement rate is so low. The average Medicare reimbursement for a mammogram is $89, Farley says.
"This is not the latest supertechnology thing that just came out of the labs and costs millions of dollars," Farley says. "These are meat-and-potatoes exams."
Farley's organization represents the doctors who give the 37 million mammogram exams in the U.S. each year. It's not a surprise that they would oppose the notion that the recommended age for women to get mammograms be raised to 50 from 40.
And it's not a leap to hear that other opponents are the companies who make the machines, like General Electric Co., Siemens AG, and Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV. The machines range in price from $250,000 to $750,000 for the latest digital models.
"There is considerable evidence breast-cancer screening saves lives in a wide range of populations," GE says in a statement. "The (new) recommendations diverge from trends in countries with established national breast-cancer screening programs, where the trend of many governments is toward screening earlier and on an annual basis similar to the longstanding success of the screening program in the United States."
The recommendation was made this week by a panel that advises government health officials. The radiologists' group has asked Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius to disavow the recommendation so insurance companies don't refuse to cover the exams. "Countless American women may die needlessly from breast cancer each year," the doctors' group says in a statement.
Insurance companies say they haven't made any decisions on coverage yet.
"For right now, we're keeping it the way we have it," says Scot Roskelley, a spokesman for Aetna Inc. Plans that have preventative coverage pay for mammograms, he says.
Brett Chase covers health care for Portfolio.com and writes the blog Heavy Doses.






