Recent Blog Posts
-
Public Option Still Divides
Nov 23 20098:49 am EDT -
Your Money or Your Life for Mammogram Change?
Nov 20 20093:22 pm EDT -
Stem-Cell Flap in the Heartland
Nov 20 20099:17 am EDT -
Flu Shots From Caterpillars? Not Yet
Nov 19 20095:23 pm EDT -
Health Chiefs Weigh In on Reform
Nov 19 20098:31 am EDT -
Santas Cry Foul Over Swine Flu
Nov 18 20096:28 pm EDT -
Reid's Bill to Cost $849 Billion
Nov 18 20096:00 pm EDT -
Faster Than Viagra
Nov 18 200912:40 pm EDT -
McKinsey Reports
Nov 18 20096:17 am EDT -
Obesity Is Going to Cost Us
Nov 17 20093:23 pm EDT
Employers Urged to Pay for Sick Leave
As employers scramble to figure out how they'll cover the loss of employees to swine flu, a Washington lawmaker wants to guarantee workers have enough sick time.
Representative George Miller, a California Democrat, says employers who send their workers home need to pay those people up to five days of sick leave. People who live paycheck to paycheck, can't afford to be off work without pay, he says. Miller, who chairs the House Education and Labor Committee, says he'll hold a hearing on his bill Nov. 16.
Miller's proposal sounds reasonable. Most big employers provide sick leave and no one wants to infect the entire workplace, right? U.S. health officials urge employers to be flexible on leave: tell workers to stay home if they're sick and don't worry about that doctor's note. What's more, workers shouldn't worry about losing their jobs if they get sick, the government says. One ill employee will infect one in 10 fellow workers.
But here's another interesting figure from the Bureau of Labor Statistics: Almost 40 percent of private-sector workers have no paid sick days. Among the bottom quartile of wage earners: 63 percent do not get paid sick leave. (The group includes restaurant and hospitality workers.)
That's a lot of people with an incentive to go to work sick.
Brett Chase covers health care for Portfolio.com and writes the blog Heavy Doses.






