Recent Blog Posts
-
Farewell
Feb 15 200812:00 am EDT -
The (Red) Auction Topples High Estimate & Other Art World News
Feb 15 200812:00 am EDT -
Flowers, Chocolates, Or Art This V-Day?
Feb 14 200812:00 am EDT -
Today in the Art World...
Feb 14 200812:00 am EDT -
The Art Theft's Choice
Feb 13 200812:00 am EDT -
Thai Antiquities, Tropical Houses
Feb 13 200812:00 am EDT -
Eli Broad's Pet Project
Feb 12 200812:00 am EDT -
Crimes of the Art World, An Interview & a Guest Blogger
Feb 12 200812:00 am EDT -
Déjà Vu
Feb 11 200812:00 am EDT -
Banksy in Chelsea?
Feb 11 200812:00 am EDT
Links
- style file, Dept. of culture

- Modern Art Obsession

- Modern Art Notes

- Rhizome

- Artdaily

- Bloomberg Muse

- Artforum

- Saatchi Gallery Blog

- Chicago Tribune, Arts and Architecture

- Art News Blog

- Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Arts

- The Art Law Blog

- ARTnews

- Artnet

- Modern Kicks

- Frieze

- Artkrush

- The Art Newspaper

- Illicit Cultural Property

- Art in America

- Art Review: Digital

- ForbesLife, Collecting

- CultureGrrl

- The New York Times, Arts and Design

- Saving Antiquities for Everyone

- Guaridan, Arts and Architecture

- The New York Sun, Arts and Letters

- Art Market Blog with Nicholas Forrest

- Maine Antique Digest

- e-flux

Rembrandt: The Met's Embarrassment of Riches
Alexandra Peers writes: The Metropolitan Museum of Art opens its big fall blockbuster, "The Age of Rembrandt," Tuesday (Sept. 18), but the unusual show has a lot more to do with saluting New Money than Old Masters.
The exhibition pointedly glorifies donors of great Dutch art to the museum over the decades. In the first room of the show, now in previews to members, names in golden letters float high above each artwork. They read. "Vanderbilt, Friedsam, Nelson." (Rembrandt and Franz Hals get second billing.) The show is organized not chronologically, or by subject, but by when the donor gave each painting to the Met or paid for its purchase, as if Vermeer's proper place in art history was when Henry G. Marquand thought he was worth buying.
If potential donors don't get the hint that philanthropy may win them immortality (the Met's board of trustess includes collectors Henry Kravis, Annette de la Renta, Shelby White, and Bruce Ratner), the pitch is unmistakable when the viewer gets to Aristotle Contemplating a Bust of Homer. On the museum's audioguide, the listener is told that Aristotle "is thinking about his career, his fame, his fortune and perhaps saying to himself 'Will I be remembered in 500 years like Homer?' "
This is a somewhat revisionist interpretation of the masterpiece. The Met's former curator of European paintings, Theodore Rousseau, wrote in 1962 that Aristotle's thoughts are "drawn into a distant world of dreams and melancholy."
The Met's press release is clear: "Broadly outlining how the collection was formed, the exhibition reflects the taste for Dutch art in America and among New York's great collectors of the past two centuries." And ultimately, the show is a triumph, if only because a half-turn away from the brooding Aristotle is Vermeer, juxtaposition as breathtaking as if the artists strode into the room together. But the show's organization gives double meaning to the term "embarrassment of riches."
Of course, donors might take a different lesson from the show--the value of investing in art. That portrait of Aristotle was bought by the Met at auction in 1961 for a now-paltry $2.3 million.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





