Recent Blog Posts
-
Farewell
Feb 15 200812:00 am EDT -
The (Red) Auction Topples High Estimate & Other Art World News
Feb 15 200812:00 am EDT -
Flowers, Chocolates, Or Art This V-Day?
Feb 14 200812:00 am EDT -
Today in the Art World...
Feb 14 200812:00 am EDT -
The Art Theft's Choice
Feb 13 200812:00 am EDT -
Thai Antiquities, Tropical Houses
Feb 13 200812:00 am EDT -
Eli Broad's Pet Project
Feb 12 200812:00 am EDT -
Crimes of the Art World, An Interview & a Guest Blogger
Feb 12 200812:00 am EDT -
Déjà Vu
Feb 11 200812:00 am EDT -
Banksy in Chelsea?
Feb 11 200812:00 am EDT
Links
- style file, Dept. of culture

- Modern Art Obsession

- Modern Art Notes

- Rhizome

- Artdaily

- Bloomberg Muse

- Artforum

- Saatchi Gallery Blog

- Chicago Tribune, Arts and Architecture

- Art News Blog

- Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Arts

- The Art Law Blog

- ARTnews

- Artnet

- Modern Kicks

- Frieze

- Artkrush

- The Art Newspaper

- Illicit Cultural Property

- Art in America

- Art Review: Digital

- ForbesLife, Collecting

- CultureGrrl

- The New York Times, Arts and Design

- Saving Antiquities for Everyone

- Guaridan, Arts and Architecture

- The New York Sun, Arts and Letters

- Art Market Blog with Nicholas Forrest

- Maine Antique Digest

- e-flux

Waiting With Baited Breath
Damien Hirst's pickled shark — officially, The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living — will be installed at New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art in late September. (Previous rumors indicated that the piece would be on view around Labor Day.) As reported by Carol Vogel in the New York Times (Culturegrrl blogger Lee Rosenbaum scooped her here), hedge fund king Steve Cohen has loaned the shark to the Met for three years after buying and restoring the rotting fish.
That the shark is going to the Met and not, say, the Museum of Modern Art (or Cohen's Connecticut offices, where it would be, according to Vogel, "an appropriate mascot for a group of aggressive traders"), is ironic. In 1999, the Met's director, Philippe de Montebello, wrote an op-ed in the Times condemning the Sensation show at the Brooklyn Museum that made the shark (in)famous. "I have seen the exhibition, and I think the emperor has not clothes," he wrote.
Has Montebello had a change of heart? Doubtful. More likely, the Met's temporary acquisition of Hirst's iconic work is evidence that not even this venerable institution can turn a blind eye to the art world's current fixation on contemporary art and that in this context, Hirst is too colossal a figure to ignore, whether or not you like his work.
But now, the Met's coup has got everyone talking. The editorial board of the New York Times came out against the shark, writing, "You may think you are looking at a dead shark in a tank, but what you're really seeing is the convergence of two careers, the coming together of two masters in the art of the yield." Rosenbaum rightly questioned from whence the board's authority on the arts came. (She also explained Hirst's diamond-encrusted skull for them, since they didn't seem to get that either.) Journalists are heralding the piece as the dawn of contemporary art at an institution traditionally more concerned with Titians and Vermeers. It is, after all, the museum that paid upwards of $45 million in 2004 for Duccio di Buoninsegna's Madonna and Child, the most expensive work it's ever bought.
|
Photo Credit: Steve Forrest/The New York Times/Redux |
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





